Background and Aim: Nowadays man's relationship with his "body parts" is very important in solving some emerging issues such as mortgage of non-main body parts. Determining the type of relationship and its scope, by finding the jurisprudential-legal roots as well as paying attention to the property of the body parts during life, are among the issues that should be re-examined. Today, unstable economic conditions and poor living conditions, especially in homeless families, have caused few people step forward as a guarantee for them in various matters. . Also due to most criminals as an example of imprisoned debtors have economic and livelihood weakness, and it is impossible to prepare blood money for them or their wisdom, and on the other hand, the rightful person wants his rights, the deboter can use some of his (non-main) body parts, as capital that he is now owned and he put in a mortage for paying the blood money by working in the society. Now it is important to examine that, in case of non-provision, according to the rule "permission in the object is also permission in its accessories" there will be this right for the right holder to donate and sell his (non-main) body parts by a legal request and through judicial procedure and introduction to health care institutions? Materials and Methods: The present study by descriptive-analytical method and by citing library sources examines the feasibility of mortgaging organs according to the mortgage contract elements after examining the property of organs. Conclusion: Taking into account the jurists’,well-known theory with rules such as "rule of domination", "principle of impropriety", "retaining the same with the satisfaction of interests", "principle of consent of agreements", "rational interests over expediency" and. . . LEGITIMACY of pledging living HUMAN body parts is verified.

One of the recent concepts in the field of organizational studies is the issue of HUMAN resource LEGITIMACY. The purpose of this study is to model the LEGITIMACY of HUMAN resource management. The present research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of nature and qualitative method of data theory. The study population includes academic experts and HUMAN resource managers of the National Iranian Oil Company. Data collection tool is semi-structured interview. The sample required for structured interviews was collected to the extent of theoretical saturation through snowball sampling. MAXQDA software was used to facilitate coding. Finally, the model of HUMAN resource LEGITIMACY was drawn based on the identification of 8 components. Components of HUMAN resource management LEGITIMACY include structural, cognitive, communicative components, HUMAN resource processes, individual characteristics, social system compliance, professional HUMAN resource, and subjective components

We are... So, to reframe the inquiry: who are we on a metaphysical level? Which aspects of ourselves are the most universally representative of who we are? How do we fare in the face of the passage of time? For decades, philosophers have debated the concept of diachronic personal identity, which focuses on the question of what keeps us alive. An intricate debate has developed between those who hold the body view (animalism) and those who hold the psychological view (memory) on the question of who we are. The two groups will eventually become so firmly set in their views that they will be unable to compromise. Hylomorphic animalism, or the view that HUMANs are rational animals, living bodies made of prime matter and a rational soul, is an alternative answer to this divisive question that I propose in this study, following in the footsteps of Aristotle and Aquinas. We only survive if matter and rational souls do.

Nowadays, one of the important issues in Iran's government organizations is gaining and maintaining LEGITIMACY. Existence of LEGITIMACY is very vital for all organizational systems that are derived from the democratic system and whose main audience is the general public. The main purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of HUMAN resource management and social responsibility on organizational LEGITIMACY. This research is descriptive-correlational in nature and practical in purpose. The statistical research population of government organizations in Tehran (251 organizations) which according to Cohen's table, 70 organizations were selected as the research sample by systematic random sampling method. It is necessary to mention that three questionnaires were distributed in each organization, and during the analysis, the average opinions were taken into account. Also, in order to collect information, the questionnaires of HUMAN resource management and Wein (2010), social responsibility of Carroll organization (1991) and organizational LEGITIMACY of Sachman (1995) were used. Also, LISREL 8.8 software was used to analyze the data. The results of the path coefficients showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between HUMAN resource management and organizational LEGITIMACY. Also, the results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between social responsibility and organizational LEGITIMACY. The results showed that social responsibility has a moderating role in the relationship between HUMAN resource management and organizational LEGITIMACY. Because the value of t statistic (3.08) was higher than the standard value of 1.96. In general, in this research, a practical and native model was presented in the field of promoting organizational LEGITIMACY through organizational HUMAN resource management and social responsibility measures, which, while filling the research gap and increasing knowledge in this field, can pave the way for future researches. smooth out

Background: Ameloblastoma an odontogenic tumor of ectodermal origin has been reported to arise, on rare occasions, in a primordial or dentigerous cyst of a young person. Numerous authors have suggested differing nomenclatures for these ameloblastomas and have sought to describe and classify the clinical and histopathologic features. These tumors have been characterized as a distinct variant exhibiting less aggressive behavior and a lower rate of recurrence than conventional ameloblastoma.Aims: This study was designed to look at the HUMAN papilloma virus as a caurse for Ameloblastoma.Materials and Methods: Samples of Ameloblastoma tumors were traced from the filing system in path lab Beheshti Dental School. Using PCR technique a search was carried out to dated HPV in DNA of samples.Results: There was a clear relationship between the rates of HPV in Ameloblastoma cases.Conclusion: HPV could be a preparing factor for Ameloblastoma.

The rapid advancement of robotic technology, while promising increased productivity and operational precision, has created unprecedented challenges for HUMAN rights frameworks and social norms. This descriptive-analytical study clearly shows that the use of robots in various fields, from industry and medicine to municipal services, can violate fundamental HUMAN rights. The widespread replacement of HUMAN labor with robots undermines the right to employment and fair working conditions. In the medical field, technical errors and vulnerability to cyberattacks in robotic surgeries endanger the right to life and health. Also, the use of systems such as unmanned aircraft, civilian drones, and sensor-equipped robots violates privacy, security, and individual freedoms. Furthermore, the autonomous nature of robots challenges traditional principles of liability and makes it difficult to account for harm. This study highlights the existing regulatory gaps and stresses the urgent need for international institutions to develop comprehensive and binding legal frameworks to curb the negative impacts of this technology and ensure its compliance with HUMAN rights standards.

LEGITIMACY of a political system is the basis for the rulers’ authority and citizens’ obedience. During the history of mankind, it has been said that, the rulers have enjoyed divine power and divine right, divine LEGITIMACY and religious LEGITIMACY has been justified through the holy books and religious texts. The disagreement about the origin of LEGITIMACY in Islam originates from epistemological and political elements. The Shiite consider divine authority in Imamat and see it as an inherent politico-religious principle whereas the Sunni consider divine authority as a result of consensus in Caliphate. The Shiite–Sunni disagreement about authority and obedience dates back to post-prophet era. Even the holders of HUMAN LEGITIMACY try to present it as a divine blessing in order to ensure their survival. The final part of this article surveys the political thought of the Shiite during the time of Imam Zaman’s absence in four stages: from the time of the formation of religious identity of the Shiite to the Islamic republic of Iran.